SOME SUGGESTIONS REGARDING A PROPOSED WORLD GOVERNMENT (cont.)

What I envision is a quite laissez faire society, wherein:
a.  clearly good and beneficial things would be instituted, permitted, and encouraged;
b.  clearly harmful things would be discouraged, and forbidden as necessary; and
c.  matters that do not by their nature readily permit of such simple and clear-cut characterizations would be subject to logical objective analyses, having a goal of arriving at the determinations, policies, and courses of action that would render the most benefit and security for the persons or groups involved, and for mankind and society in general.

 Of course, there must also be systems and procedures in place for the purpose of enacting modifications and/or repeal of certain statutory enactments, as such should become necessary.  Moreover, new and additional enactments would also need to be instituted as time and events should indicate,  Underlying all of this is a logical assumption, bolstered by a perpetual requirement, whereby that which is logically and objectively determined to be best for mankind and society will be consonant with, or equivalent to, the will of the people.

 I believe that this would, moreover, automatically be, or become, the norm.  For it is my belief that if reasonable, and relatively happy and secure, people are afforded all of the facts and circumstances of a situation, together with an analysis or rationale concerning it, their common sense and native intelligence would lead most, if not virtually all, to such determinations--as opposed to the emotional conclusions and hostile responses that are frequently arrived at and expressed by insecure, deprived,  unhappy, and angry people--and/or people "whipped" into occasional frenzy by political leaders.

I do not claim to have--nor will anyone ever have--all of the answers.  Only time and effort will indicate approaches to be taken, as well as subsequent improvements thereto.  Perhaps this might be additionally aided by the benefits of more and more universal education.  But none of this process must ever approximate anything like dictatorship, or "brainwashing."  Thus, I do not claim to be offering "recipes"--but merely suggestions.  Additional minds and work are necessary.  However, it is my sincere hope and belief that this will be able to be achieved, given sufficient time and opportunity.  I base this optimism at least in part upon the fact that the human race appears to be becoming more and more intelligent and resourceful as time goes on; and that such intelligence and resourcefulness seems to be spreading over greater areas of our world as the yearsd go by.  Currently, some distressing conditions and states of affairs have compelled application of these ever-increasing qualities in the interest of hostility and conflict.  But I hope and believe that one day, most of us will comprehend and appreciate our need for a united peaceful and harmonious society, guided by a single expert leadership, who will seek only to protect mankind and improve our world.

                                                                * * * * *

I must agree that all of this suggests some giant, and likely uncomfortable, prospective leaps forward.  But, I submit, our present array of political and statutory systems worldwide leave much to be desired, regarding many things in a great many places.

In short, it is time for reason and objectivity to overshadow and overcome the shackles of time-worn tradition that have shaped, and in many places continue to impose, foolish and hurtful conditions under which prople continue to be bound and oppressed.  The attention of mankind's leading exsperts in efforts to correct such deficiencies, and the single superior worldwide system of government which should result therefrom, can only represent an overall improvement to the present state of affairs worldwide.

                                                            * * * * *